
The dynamic evidence page
Little serious business here.
After class, [Professor Kelly] Jolley and I walked across Auburn’s mostly deserted campus and into town for lunch. It was oppressively hot and humid; Jolley wore a fraying straw boater to keep the sun off his face. Over pizza and iced tea, I asked him if he ever wondered whether his style of teaching might be inappropriate for a large state school like Auburn — if the cost of his approach is that he’s teaching to the few rather than the many. “My view is that you really fall into a trap when you start allowing what you believe about your students to dictate how you teach your discipline,” he answered. “Too often these days we end up setting up our courses in light of what we believe about our students and we end up not teaching them. At best, we end up housebreaking them.”
[snip, snip]
In Jolley’s ideal world, every student would catch the philosophy flame, but he knows this will never happen. He says that philosophy requires a certain rare and innate ability — the ability to step outside yourself and observe your own mind in the act of thinking. In this respect, Jolley recognizes that his detractors have a point when they criticize his approach to teaching. “It’s aristocratic in the sense that any selection based on talent is aristocratic,” he told me. “I know it offends everyone’s sense of democracy, this idea that everyone’s equal, but we all know that’s just not true.”
Perhaps the dispute between Jolley and his critics boils down to how you define great teachers. You typically think about them as being devoted, above all, to their students. Jolley says his first priority is to philosophy itself. “I care about the discipline of philosophy more than the academic fate of any individual student — and I think I should,” he said. “Otherwise I’m just a baby sitter who occasionally breaks into syllogism.”
One has the sense or hope that Prof. Jolley thinks the "best" students are the most inquisitive. And with that thesis it is hard to disagree.
Medicare is going bankrupt (it is said) and we can't continue down that path!
Wall Street is going bankrupt (it is a fact) and we can't continue down that path. Throw the Street a trillion dollars! That'll fix things. But ... Social Security ... Medicare? Well...we can't afford such profligacy, now can we?
Well, gee, that's an interesting proposition. Or not?
A leading opposition figure in Russia's volatile Ingushetia province was shot and killed Sunday after being detained by police, authorities said. His colleagues issued a call for protests in response, and human rights groups demanded an investigation.
Magomed Yevloyev, a businessman and the owner of a Web site that angered Kremlin-backed local leaders with its coverage of official corruption and police abuse, suffered a gunshot wound to his head while in a police car taking him to a station for interrogation, a spokesman for the Russian prosecutor's office told the Interfax news agency.
But how did the Chinese news agency manage to come up with this large number just two days after the earthquake? Is there a chance it might be a bit high? A bit low? A bit too precise?
In some countries the public worries about the psyche of the Great Man. Now are to worry about the psyche of the Great Woman?
Disgusting. We've got more important things to worry about.
...NATO foreign ministers were discussing possibly scaling back high-level meetings and military cooperation with Russia if it does not abandon crucial positions across Georgia.
There is good reason to wonder.
The only real protection against Russian military aggression may be to live in the U.S.A. -- or in another country with its own "nuclear shield" -- or in a country such as Afghanistan. (China, for many reasons, is almost surely immune to Russian military aggression.)
Irredentism, it seems, is an ever-recurring human disease.
Is the life expectancy of a Russian male at birth still approximately 57 years? Ah, Russian imperial glory. Well, at least Russia still leads Zimbabwe in this respect. Or so one hopes.
But there is a bright lining to every dark cloud: the reconquest of Georgia would provide more real estate for dachas for Russian apparatchiks -- and, who knows?, it might lead to the birth of a new (Georgian? non-Georgian?) Stalin.
What is the meaning of the KGB in the 21st century?
The KGB is crude, dirty, and violent.
Vladimir Putin was a KGB agent.
Perhaps Putin still is a KGB agent -- at least in spirit. But, if so, this KGB man wraps himself in religion.
The Russian state is Putin's god.
God (the real one) help us all!